Bullocks versus Bollocks--veinglory

It seems to me that it often takes a certain kind of person to run a small business, seize a potion in an influential association or otherwise become influential in publishing. It is by no means a universal thing, but a certain bullish approach can be useful in getting any enterprise off the ground. Anyone who is easily dissuaded would ... well, not start a small business in the first place. Given the chances of the average e-publisher to succeed you might even need to be a little unrealistic and maybe a bit over-confident too. But even with e-publishing starting to feel like a pot of pop-corn of a low fire I don't think that you need to be crazy to run an epublisher, or even that it helps.
Because at the end of the day the ones that are running all over the internet attacking authors, reviewers and bloggers are not the ones that are doing a terribly good job as publishers. A focused ambitious publisher need not be
too unrealistic or over-confident because they will have qualifications, start up capital and a market plan. You don't succeed as an epublisher through pure chance anymore than a manuscript comes out of the slush pile on the basis of a lottery drawing. And if you have a dispute, as some of the principles at Samhain and Ellora's Cave apparently do--you have the dispute with each others and if necessary through legal channels.
And when the whole thing hits the blogs they don't comment, they don't attack bystanders, throw insults around the blogverse and generally act like wet cats on crack as certain others are inclined too. And that is why the recent litigation does not in fact make me worry about the future of either publisher. This issue has brought back those persistent rumors (
see comments) that things are going a bit downhill at Ellora's Cave, sales-wise, but given how much further up hill they currently are I don't doubt they are still very much leading the field.